Illinois legislation would reward creation of affordable housingBy Kevin Beese Staff Reporter — July 29, 2019
Legislation is pending in the Illinois Senate that would provide property tax incentives for creating “affordable” rental units.
Senate President John Cullerton (D-Chicago) has proposed the incentives for newly constructed or rehabilitated rental property, if the owner of the property commits that, for 10 years, at least 20 percent of the multifamily building’s units are designated as “affordable housing.”
“We are looking at lowering the equalized assessed valuation” of properties adhering to the 20 percent affordable housing proposal, Cullerton said.
He said he hopes to advance the legislation in the fall legislative session.
Curt Bailey president of Related Midwest, a developer of luxury residential and affordable housing intermixed, said the legislation could make a huge impact on affordable housing in Illinois.
“I think this could be a game changer,” Bailey told lawmakers last week (July 18) during a Senate hearing regarding Cullerton’s proposed legislation. “It is one prong in a multi-prong approach to affordable housing.”
He said developers not being out any money is key in getting them to generate more affordable housing in their projects. The property tax incentives would be used to compensate owners of rental property for the difference between all units at max pricing and 20 percent of a building’s units being at “affordable” levels.
Bailey said the maximum income a family of four could have and still qualify for affordable housing units is $38,000 per year.
The Related Midwest president said he has shovel-ready projects set to go should the legislation become law in Illinois.
Related Midwest has created more than 60,000 affordable housing units in New York, Boston, Los Angeles and San Francisco under legislation already approved in those states. Bailey said that in New York alone his firm has created 38,000 affordable housing units.
Under Cullerton’s proposal, projects meeting the affordable housing criteria would get reductions in their equalized assessed value in an amount equal to a percentage of the difference between the EAV in the year for which the incentive is sought and the EAV for the property in the base year. The EAV reductions would be as high as 80 percent in years three and four of the 10-year deal.
Bailey cited a 2018 DePaul University study that showed the supply of affordable housing in Chicago shrinking between 2012 and 2016. He attributed the drop in affordable housing in Chicago to older buildings lapsing out of the city’s affordable unit program and formerly affordable units being revamped as part of a building upgrade and the renovated units being sold at market-rate units.
Cullerton’s legislation would allow the chief assessment officer of a county with 3 million or more inhabitants to enact the program. The program would be established in counties with 3 million or fewer inhabitants with the passage of an ordinance to do so by a majority of the county board.
“This is a very important component of how we get affordable housing,” Related Midwest’s Bailey said.
Bailey said that Cullerton’s proposal would work as a way to get more affordable housing units in higher-income areas. He noted that along with property tax incentives, other renters pay more to subsidize individuals in the affordable housing units.
“You can have someone paying $4,000 a month in rent next to someone paying $400 a month in rent,” Bailey said.
Sen. Dan McConchie (R-Hawthorne Woods) said he is concerned that the tax credits given to the developers would just mean more taxes for others.
“We obviously have the second-highest property taxes in the nation and whenever we create another tax credit, we end up shifting that tax burden to others,” McConchie said. “We do it for veterans; we do it for senior citizens; we do it for other groups. I want to make sure we are limiting that tax transference and getting to the root of the problem.”
Bailey and Cullerton both said the developments that the tax incentives would trigger would not happen without the tax credits so the legislation would actually bring more tax money into an area rather than less.