All state revenue options remain on the table

By Jerry Nowicki Capitol News Illinois

Deputy Gov. Andy Manar talks to host Jak Tichenor on the set of “Illinois Lawmakers,” Illinois’ longest-running state government-focused TV program that is now a production of Capitol News Illinois. Manar told Tichenor none of the governor’s revenue proposals — or any brought forth by the General Assembly — are off the table with just remaining in the legislative session. (Photo by Jerry Nowicki/Capitol News Illinois)

While the governor’s office instructed agency directors to identify $800 million in potential budget cuts, all facets of the plan to raise $1.1 billion in revenue to avoid cuts remain under consideration.  

Deputy Gov. Andy Manar relayed that point on the latest episode of “Illinois Lawmakers,” adding that the administration is also open to ideas from lawmakers. The program has been recently acquired by Capitol News Illinois. 

Episodes of “Illinois Lawmakers” are available here on Friday afternoons  

“The governor has said that if the legislature doesn’t support one or multiple of those individual pieces of his proposal, whether that’s revenue or spending, that all ideas should be welcomed,” Manar told host Jak Tichenor.  

The General Assembly is scheduled to adjourn Friday, May 24 — and one week left before more votes are needed to pass an immediately effective budget — but the last-minute budgeting process is nothing new. Budget negotiations in recent years have resulted in late nights and the occasional overtime session but have ultimately ended in agreement among most Democrats, who control the legislature.  

“I have no doubt this will come together,” Manar said. “And we will again pass now our sixth balanced budget.” 

Thus far, the negotiations between the governor’s office and Democratic leaders have spawned at least one likely addition to the revenue mix that could raise another $30 million to $50 million beyond what Gov. J.B. Pritzker had planned.  

Sen. Cristina Castro, a high-ranking Democrat from Elgin, told Tichenor she’s pushing a “re-renters” tax on third-party entities that resell large blocks of hotel rooms. Castro said those groups don’t pay the standard hotel operator’s room occupation tax, but they’d be required to do so under her plan, which she expects to be included in the final revenue package.  

While other additions could be forthcoming, the ultimate revenue plan is likely to include at least some portion of Pritzker’s initial proposal if state spending is to reach the roughly $53 billion mark he proposed. His revenue plan, and the opposition to it, is summarized below. 

 $526 million — extending an expiring cap 

Nearly half of the governor’s proposed revenue increase comes from a plan to make a corporate tax deduction more generous than it was for the previous tax year.  

Corporations were allowed to carry forward $100,000 in net operating losses for the most recent tax period. Next time they file, under the governor’s plan, they’d be able to carry forward $500,000 in net operating losses.  

So how is it revenue-generating?  

The $100,000 cap was set to expire this year, meaning there would be no cap in place if lawmakers take no action on the measure. So, putting the cap in place – and allowing corporations to claim more operating losses — would increase revenue by $526 million.  

 $200 million — upping the tax on sportsbooks  

Right now, Illinois sportsbooks — or those who take the bets, such as DraftKings, FanDuel and state casinos — pay a 15 percent tax on their net revenues. When sports betting became legal with the passage of a 2019 law, those revenues were earmarked to fund bond debt taken out to support the state’s building infrastructure.  

Pritzker has proposed hiking the tax rate to 35 percent, with everything beyond the previous rate going to the General Revenue Fund — or the state’s main spending account. While sportsbooks have said they’d offer fewer profit boosts and other enticements to bettors if the measure passes, Pritzker emphasizes it’s not those making the bets, but those taking them that will bear the brunt of the tax hike.  

 $175 million — shifting some expenses to the Road Fund  

Some labor unions and road builders oppose another facet of the plan — an accounting measure that moves some public transit spending to the Road Fund and frees up General Revenue Fund space.  

The Road Fund would send $175 million to the Public Transportation Fund — an expenditure that falls in line with the 2016 “lock box” amendment to the state’s constitution that limits taxes collected on motor fuel as well as transportation-related fees to be used only on transportation-related projects.  

As a result of that move, an extra $175 million would remain in the General Revenue Fund.  

While at first blush it appears to be an accounting trick, such a move faces opposition from certain labor unions — a powerful Democratic constituency that opposes the redirection of any dollar from road- and bridge-building. 

 $101 million — cap on the “retailers discount”  

Another proposal would generate $101 million by capping Illinois’ so-called “retailers discount.” Illinois retailers receive a discount of 1.75 percent of the sales tax they collect as reimbursement for their efforts to collect them. The governor’s change would cap the amount claimed at $1,000 per month.  

Illinois Department of Revenue Director David Harris said in March the proposed cap would affect only “2 to 3 percent” of retailers — but would have a “significant” impact on the largest retailers.  

The Illinois Retail Merchants Association — a powerful lobbying group in Springfield — opposes a reduction to the credit. During a House committee hearing this week, IRMA President Rob Karr said Illinois retailers do a lot of work to administer the tax — including reading food labels to determine ingredient makeup so they know which tax to apply on each specific item among several other bureaucratic requirements.  

All that costs time and money to administer, Karr said, noting: “1.75 percent is a partial reimbursement for our costs of serving as the state sales tax collector.”  

But negotiations continue on that plan. House Bill 5844, sponsored by Rep. WIll Guzzardi, would increase the percentage of the discount to 2.5 percent but lower the cap to $500 monthly.  

 $118 million — other, less publicized proposals  

The governor’s revenue plan also contains a pair of less publicized — and likely less popular — proposals.  

That includes a $25 million redistribution of real estate tax revenues to GRF instead of the Open Space Land Acquisition and Development Fund, which funds parks and recreation projects.  

Groups like the Illinois Association of Park Districts have been maneuvering to block the move — and prevent such “fund sweeps” moving forward. House Bill 4502, which would prevent sweeps of OSLAD revenues, cleared the House 108-0 and awaits action in the Senate.  

The final $93 million leg of the governor’s revenue plan pertains to individual taxpayers. It increases the state’s standard deduction — an amount most taxpayers can claim against their taxable income — to $2,550, up from $2,425. 

In the same vein as the corporate net operating loss cap — it’s considered revenue-generating because the deduction was slated to increase to $2,775 under statute, due to inflation. In other words, the governor wants the deduction to increase, but in a less generous fashion than it would have if lawmakers simply did nothing. 

jnowicki@capitolnewsillinois.com 

Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service covering state government. It is distributed to hundreds of newspapers, radio and TV stations statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation, along with major contributions from the Illinois Broadcasters Foundation and Southern Illinois Editorial Association.