School districts financial footing improves throughout the state
By Jean Lotus Staff Reporter — April 18, 2017The Illinois State Board of Education released ranked annual financial reports for every school district in the state based on 2016 numbers on April 13.
In spite of economic uncertainty, the number of school districts in the ISBE’s lowest category, “financial watch,” fell from 32 in 2015 to 19 this year. More districts were ranked in the state’s top category, “financial recognition” with 632 this year compared with 568 in 2016.
Districts received a financial health score from 1 to 4, with four categories of designation for best to worst: Financial Recognition, Financial Review, Financial Warning and Financial Watch.
Financial watch districts, the lowest ranking, had several common traits, the report said. Districts with deficit spending were more reliant on state funding, were taxing at a higher rate than comparable districts and were depending on long- or short-term debt to sustain operations.
More districts were also ranked in the state’s top category, financial recognition with 632 this year compared with 568 in 2016.
State Superintendent Tony Smith said the numbers revealed “consequences of inadequate and inequitable state funding” in a press release.
The General Assembly budget impasse in 2015-16 left many state K-12 schools unsure whether they would have funds to remain open until June 30, when the legislature finally passed a “Stop-Gap” budget, releasing money for schools at the very end of their fiscal year. Yet, of 852 school districts reporting, the number of “deficit-spending” districts increased from 382 in 2015 to 409, or 48 percent in 2016.
“Illinois must overhaul our school funding model, which is the most inadequate and the most inequitable in the country,” Smith said. “Every school district in the state is having to make hard choices to cover the day-to-day costs of keeping their schools’ doors open. Forcing school districts to rely primarily on taxing local property wealth to fund education inherently means the students who need the most will receive the least. We expect dedication, innovation, and improvement from our administrators, educators, and students; we owe them the resources necessary to meet those expectations.”
Administrators have had to make hard choices, the report said.
“[Administrators] have chosen to reduce expenditures via reductions in force, forgo supplies, delay facility repairs/maintenance, and delay purchase of replacement buses. They have also increased cash balances by issuing debt or restructuring debt payments. Districts are now at a point where additional budget reductions are going to be very difficult to realize without impacting the education of students,” the report said.
“Although the data points indicate a positive trend, what they do not reflect is the lost opportunities for children in this state as a result the continued state cash flow issues,” the report continued.
Districts were scored on five factors. The fund balance-to-revenue ratio reflects the district’s overall financial health by dividing the year-end balance of each of four funds by the fund’s total revenue. Funds are Education, Operations and Maintenance, Working Cash and Transportation. The expenditure-to-revenue ratio identifies how much is spent for every dollar received. The days cash-on-hand shows how long the district could maintain expenditures with no additional revenue. The highest scored districts have at least 180 days cash on hand. Finally, the ISBE evaluated the percentage amount of short-term and long-term debt the district can borrow.
Individual school district financial profiles can be found on the ISBE website at: https://www.isbe.net/Pages/School-District-Financial-Profile.aspx
Cook
In Cook County, a number of districts in the economically hard-hit Southwest suburbs showed financial improvements. The biggest jump was Summit-Argo High School, D104 in Summit, which improved its score from 2.45 (Financial Watch) in 2015 to 3.60 (Financial Recognition) in 2016.
Cook Co. Schools that improved in financial ranking
District 2015 score 2016 score
Alsip/Blue Island SD 130 3.45 Review 3.80 Recognition
Dolton SD 148 3.35 Review 3.60 Recognition
Dolton SD 149 2.80 Early Warning 3.60 Recognition
Hazel Crest SD 125.5 3.35 Review 3.60 Recognition
Homewood Flossmoor CHSD 233 3.35 Review 3.80 Recognition
Hoover-Schrum Memorial SD 157 3.25 Review 3.60 Recognition
Maywood/Melrose Park D89 3.25 Review 3.60 Recognition
Penoyner SD 79 3.35 Review 3.80 Recognition
Summit Argo HS 104 2.45 Watch 3.60 Recognition
Sunnybrook SD 171 3.45 Review 3.80 Recognition
Wheeling CCSD21 2.30 Watch 3.35 Review
Cook Co. school districts that dropped in financial rank:
District 2015 score 2016 score
Elmwood Park CUSD 401 3.80 Recognition 3.35 Review
ESD 159 (Matteson) 3.70 Recognition 3.35 Review
LaGrange SD 102 3.25 Review 2.90 Early Warning
LaGrange SD 105 South 3.80 Recognition 3.45 Review
Lyons SD 103 3.80 Recognition 3.45 Review
Prospect Heights SD 23 3.80 Recognition 3.45 Review
Thornton Twsp HS D 205 3.45 Review 3.00 Early Warning
W Harvey-Dixmoor D147 3.25 Review 2.90 Early Warning
Western Springs 3.80 Recognition 3.45 Review
DeKalb Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
DeKalb CUSD 428 3.35 Review 3.70 Recognition
Genoa Kingston CUSD 424 3.65 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Hiawatha CUSD 426 3.45 Review 3.80 Recognition
Hinckley Big Rock 429 3.35 Review 3.80 Recognition
Indian Creek CUSD 425 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Sandwich CUSD 430 2.65 Early Warning 3.45 Review
Somonauk CUSD 432 3.90 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Sycamore CUSD 427 2.80 Early Warning 2.80 Early Warning
KANE Co
District 2015 score 2016 score
Aurora East USD 131 3.35 Review 3.70 Recognition
Aurora West USD 129 2.65 Early Warning 2.90 Early Warning
Batavia USD 101 3.00 Early Warning 3.45 Review
Central CUSD 301 3.80 Recognition 3.80 Recognition
CUSD 300 3.60 Recognition 3.60 Recognition
Geneva CUSD 304 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
Kaneland CUSD 302 3.35 Review 3.00 Early Warning
SD U-46 3.80 Recognition 3.80 Recognition
St Charles CUSD 303 4.0 Recognition 4.0 Recognition
Kendall Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
CUSD 308 2.90 Early Warning 2.80 Early Warning
Lisbon CCSD 90 3.65 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Newark CCSD 66 3.55 Recognition 3.55 Recognition
Newark CHSD 18 3.65 Recognition 4.0 Recognition
Plano CUSD 88 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
Yorkville CUSD 115 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
McHenry Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
Alden Hebron SD 19 4.00 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Cary CCSD 26 3.70 Recognition 3.80 Recognition
CHSD 155 4.00 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Crystal Lake CCSD 47 3.90 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Fox River Grove Cons SD 3 3.90 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Harrison SD 36 3.80 Recognition 3.45 Review
Harvard CUSD 50 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
Huntley CSD 158 3.80 Recognition 3.80 Recognition
Johnsburg CUSD 12 2.00 Watch 2.35 Watch
Marengo CHSD 154 3.65 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Marengo-Union E Cons 165 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
McHenry CCSD 15 3.90 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
McHenry CHSD 156 3.90 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Nippersink SD 2 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Prairie Grove CSD 46 3.90 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Richmond-Burton CHSD 157 3.90 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Riley CCSD 18 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Woodstock CUSD 200 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
McClean Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
Bloomington SD 87 3.90 Recognition 3.55 Recognition
Heyworth CUSD 4 3.35 Review 3.70 Recognition
LeRoy CUSD 2 3.35 Review 3.35 Review
Lexington CUSD 7 3.35 Review 3.70 Recognition
McLean County USD 5 3.25 Review 3.25 Review
Olympia CUSD 16 3.45 Review 3.90 Recognition
Ridgeview CUSD 19 4.00 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Tri Valley CUSD 3 3.65 Recognition 3.90 Recognition
Peoria Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
Peoria Heights CUSD 325 3.45 Review 3.55 Recognition
Peoria SD 150 2.80 Early Warning 2.90 Early Warning
Pleasant Hill SD 69 3.55 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Pleasant Valley SD 62 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
WINNEBAGO Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
Hononegah CHD 207 N/A 3.55 Recognition
Kinnikinnick CCSD 131 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Pecatonica CUSD 321 3.65 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Prairie Hill CCSD 133 3.70 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
Rockford SD 205 3.70 Recognition 3.60 Recognition
Rockton SD 140 380 Recognition 390 Recognition
Shirland CCSD 134 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Winnebago CUSD 323 3.65 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
WOODFORD Co.
District 2015 score 2016 score
County of Woodford School 4.00 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
El Paso-Gridley CUSD 11 3.10 Review 3.45 Review
Eureka CUD 140 3.65 Recognition 4.00 Recognition
Fieldcrest CUSD 6 3.45 Review 3.45 Review
Germantown Hills SD 69 3.65 Recognition 3.70 Recognition
Lowpoint-Washburn CUSD 21 3.55 Recognition 3.55 Recognition
Metamora CCSD 1 3.25 Review 3.65 Recognition
Riverview CCSD 2 3.65 Recognition 3.65 Recognition
Roanoke Benson CUSD 60 3.35 Review 3.35 Review
— School districts financial footing improves throughout the state —